
Conver-Stations for Literary Discussion
How does literary analysis make you a more critical reader, writer, or speaker?
Learning Objectives
I can analyze and cite a text to engage in meaningful discussion with peers, as evidenced by my active participation in the Conver-stations and my post-activity reflection.
Instructional Rationale
Students have been reading, discussing, and interacting with a text. You can use Conver-stations to guide students’ discussion over any chapter/section of a text. You can pull questions from previous readings to reinforce skills or make connections between different sections to engage prior knowledge with present learning.
Students are meaningfully learning by making connections on their own based on teacher-created questions by citing the text and exploring it to back up their analysis of the text.
This activity includes students moving from one group to another (either physically in an in-person setting, or from one breakout room to another in a virtual/hybrid setting), visual displays of the questions on student devices or the classroom screen, listening and speaking with peers, as well as writing down ideas, questions, and connections to the text in the discussion. Students can then share ideas in a variety of ways (whole class discussion, pair and share, written, recorded using Flipgrid or similar program).
This lesson aligns with CRP tenets by allowing students to interact with a variety of their peers. This allows for students to hear multiple perspectives and also allows students to create authentic connections between whatever novel they are studying and their own life. To take things a step further towards student advocacy, the teacher can even create discussion questions that tie the learning in the novel to the community, the classroom, the school, etc. Consider, as the instructor, what learning from the novel can apply to students’ everyday lives. The teacher can choose to use a novel that reflects the experiences of their students in order to create the most culturally responsive approach. For example, a teacher might use the novel Seedfolks, and then allow students to examine food insecurity, culture, etc. of their neighborhood and create ways to move towards a solution (start a community garden, pass out seedlings to schoolmates or the neighborhood, etc.)
Technology is used in a variety of ways. First, the teacher can create a slide deck of questions about the section of the novel to be discussed and use this to guide student learning by projecting it onto the classroom screen. Students can use their devices to take notes and write down ideas during discussion and then use some sort of tool (i.e. FlipGrid) to synthesize their learning, ideas, and questions after the activity, which allows other students to then react to those ideas for a more meaningful experience.
Assessments
This activity is best used as a formative assessment. You can have students prepare their own questions for discussion prior to Conver-stations and use the student-created questions for the activity, or the teacher can create the question and assess students after the activity by asking them to reflect: what did they learn, what did they notice, and what new questions or ideas do the students have as a result of discussion? (You could also do both of these things for a dual-assessment). Teachers can also formatively assess student understanding by observing the learners and listening to their insights while they speak with peers.
The purpose of the assessment is to see how students can interact with the text, not only to assess what they learned from reading, but also to see how they can cite examples from the text to create ideas, draw conclusions, etc. about a question they are asked to respond to.
The assessments are UDL-friendly because students can share their ideas in a variety of ways, whether that be verbally (to a peer, on FlipGrid, audio recording, etc.) or in writing (paper/pencil or typed digitally). They can also, if the teacher is asking the students to generate the Conver-station questions, either submit their questions in writing, or share them by speaking them in one of the methods suggested above. These assessments are also CRP-friendly because this method can be applied to any type of literature or any book. Ideally, the book is one that is responsive to the students in the room (they can see themselves in the story). It also allows for students to interact with each other and in the assessment piece, students can talk about what they learned from their peers, or how their peers’ ideas gave them new insights or questions to consider.
You can check student understanding by the questions they submit prior to the activity (if the teacher chooses to do this), as they will have to cite the portion of the story that the questions originate from. Teachers can also check for what students know and can do by what they say, record, or how they participate during the actual Conver-station activity where students are holding discussion, as they will have to direct their peers to the page and information in the text that led to their answer. Finally, educators can check for understanding of student knowledge through the student reflection after the activity where they share what their group discussed and what new insights, ideas, or questions they have now as a result, where they will also cite specific examples or instances from the story.
Materials & Resources
Procedures & Implementation
Introducing and Facilitating the Lesson
Depending on teacher decision, the teacher will have either the student-generated or teacher-generated questions put onto a slide deck prior to class that will be used to lead discussion. Have the opening slide that contains the activity name and learning objective projected or shared with students to access when they enter class.
Hook students by explaining that instead of having a conversation, this is Conver-STATIONs, meaning they have the chance to move around the room and have discussions with small groups over the questions on the slide deck. (1-2 mins)
- If in a hybrid/virtual setting, students will move through various breakout rooms in lieu of moving around the room.
Stage 1
Review the learning objective with the students, explaining each component as you go. The main goal is to be able to cite specific examples from the text and to share those examples during a discussion with peers. Then, students will share overall learning with the teacher and the class via a reflection (teacher decides how students will reflect, but options could include FlipGrid, audio recording, written reflection, etc.) (2 mins)
Stage 2
Explain to students that they will be in groups of 3-5 (this will depend on the teacher’s class size) and they will have 4-5 minutes to read, discuss, and create an answer to the question on the screen. They must cite specific examples from the text in order to be successful. Then, when the timer goes off, the teacher can ask a few students to share what they decided with the class, or the teacher can have students wait to share until the reflection. Then, 2-3 students (depending on group size) move from their current group to a new group, a new question will be on the screen, and the process repeats until the questions have all been discussed. (2-3 mins)
Stage 3
Put students into their groups (these can be predetermined or random, depending on teacher’s discretion), and present the first discussion question. Set the timer for 4-5 minutes and allow students to have discussion. During this time, move around the room and listen to student discussion, ask follow-up questions to students, etc. (if you are in a hybrid/virtual setting, move between breakout rooms). When the timer goes off, if the teacher elects to have students share ideas with the whole group, they may then tell the groups to choose who is moving and give the students a minute to transition (if hybrid/virtual, recreate which students are in each breakout room). Repeat this process until all questions have been answered. (6-8 minutes per round)
Stage 4
After all questions have been answered, have students return to their seat (or end the breakout rooms). Introduce options for students to complete their reflection (this could be a variety of teacher or student-selected mediums, such as: FlipGrid, audio recording, written/typed response, etc.). Give students time to synthesize what they learned, found interesting/insightful, and what they are still wondering about moving forward (they can do this with a partner, you can talk about it as a class, or they can synthesize individually. This is also a great time for the teacher to ask students to move towards advocacy and consider how they can use their learning to create positive impact/change/opportunity in the school, classroom, community, etc.). Once they have synthesized, students can complete the reflection in the format of their choosing. The reflection can also be a homework activity if the teacher is concerned about running out of class time from doing the discussion portion. (10-15 mins)
Standards & Indicators
From the Indiana Academic Standards English Language Arts: Grades 9-10 and the Indiana Academic Standards English Language Arts: Grades 11-12.
- 9-10.RL.2.1 Analyze what a text says both explicitly and implicitly as well as inferences and interpretations through citing strong and thorough textual evidence.
- 9-10.SL.2.2 Examine, analyze, and reflect on ideas under discussion, by providing textual evidence in order to support or refute those ideas.
- 11-12.RL.2.1 Analyze what a text says explicitly and implicitly as well as inferences and interpretations drawn from the text through citing textual evidence determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
- 11-12.SL.2.2 Engage in a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas by referring to specific evidence.
Trajectory

Acknowledged
Throughlines

Multiple Ways of Knowing and Doing

Equitable Practices and Systems

Intentional Use of Technology
Standards

Social Justice
